NFL gamblers were irate over a pointless field goal, as explained by Sean McVay.

NFL gamblers were irate over a pointless field goal, as explained by Sean McVay.

In the closing seconds of Sunday’s 30-23 loss to the San Francisco 49ers, Los Angeles Rams head coach Sean McVay decided to kick a field goal.

After the last-second field goal by the Los Angeles Rams irritated NFL gamblers in Las Vegas, head coach Sean McVay of the team has provided an explanation.

Sunday’s Week Two NFL match between the Rams and San Francisco 49ers saw the Rams lose 30-23.
The Rams’ defeat leaves them with a record of 1-1 through their first two games of the season, placing them second in the NFC West.

The Rams’ game-ending field goal, which made the score 30-23 and put them in a seven-point deficit, prompted questions of McVay. The Rams had almost no time left on the clock as the offense advanced to a fourth down after passing midfield.

The 38-yard field goal by Brett Maher whittled the point differential to seven.
Nevertheless, some fans were confused by the Rams’ choice to attempt a field goal that ultimately had no bearing on their chances of winning the match, especially given that the game’s pointspread at the majority of sportsbooks was 7–5.

When kicking the field goal earlier, McVay explained, “What we were trying to do is we were trying to be able to get a completion to where we had the opportunity to be able to – if we had hit that deep in-breaking route, it really would’ve worked out the way that we wanted to.”.

“Once we were in field goal range, we were going to try to kick a field goal to set ourselves up for an onside kick and a real chance to win the game.

When it came down to it, “[I] didn’t anticipate that in-cut that we hit Puka [Nacua] running that long and just said, “Alright, go ahead and kick the field goal.

“[I] felt like it was a chance to get a chance for our field goal operation and not expose Matthew [Stafford] to an unnecessary heave to the end zone.

The initial objective was to try to get a two-for-one so that, with some of the play choices we had, you end up getting into field goal range a little bit earlier and then be able to try to have an onside kick to be able to go try to compete to tie or win the game.

Evidently [Rams V.
P. of communications] Artis [Twyman] informed me that many people in Vegas are upset by that choice.
Obviously, I was unaware of that information.

Those who bet on San Francisco against the spread would have won their wagers if they had triumphed by eight or more points.
But because of the field goal, the difference in points was only seven, which gave many gamblers trouble.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *